February 27, 2009
A third Immunization post. I promise to move on to other subjects…
For the lazy readers who don’t have the time or inclination to do research but are interested in vaccine safety and efficacy, I’d like to suggest a podcast that you can listen to. Infectious Disease specialist Mark Crislip, MD has addressed the topic in a recent Quackcast podcast which can be found here.
Don’t expect someone sympathetic to the anti-vaccinationists and celebrity a-holes promoting them. Dr. Crislip addresses the safety of several vaccines, the vaccine – autopsy connection (or lack of), and why the claims made by the Green Vaccine movement are completely bogus.
In case, you don’t listen to the whole thing, Dr. Crislip ends the podcast with the following thought: “Greener vaccines? The only green you will see by getting rid of vaccines, or decreasing their use, is the grass growing on the graves of children needlessly killed by preventable infections.”
February 12, 2009
Posted by Chuck under Ethics
| Tags: anti-medicine
, bad science
Leave a Comment
Saw this and wanted to pass it along to readers of my last post about Autism and Vaccines. Turns out that the doctor (Andrew Wakefield) who first proposed the link between autism and vaccines may have faked the data. If true, that man should be shot (after a long torture session with Jack Bauer.)
Of course, many people will ignore this and still not get their children vaccinated putting their children as well as others at risk. When Jack is done with Dr. Wakefield, maybe he can visit Jenny McCarthy, Oprah, and the other anti-vaccination terrorists. Yes I said terrorists. The anti-science, anti-medicine, anti-reason people who promote not vaccinating children put far more people in danger than Al Qaeda and should be held accountable when helpless children die.
February 12, 2009
Posted by Chuck under medicine
| Tags: autism
Leave a Comment
A federal court ruled today in a case involving parents of autistic children who are seeking compensation through the government’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. These parents believe that their childrens’ autism was caused by vaccinations. Health agencies as well as all but a few fringe scientists and doctors have maintained that there is no causal relationship between autism and vaccines. The court stated that the evidence is overwhelmingly contrary to the parents claim.
This case has been watched by many in the scientific and health care communities as well as many others. More than 5500 claims have been filed by parents seeking compensation. Additionally, there has been an increase in parents all over the country declining vaccines for their children because of autism fears.
Of course, this decision will not persuade most of the parents that their children’s autism was not caused by vaccines. Several years of research from around the world hasn’t been able to do that so this certainly won’t. In fact, the head of Vaccine Information Center (which promotes the idea) said “I think it is a mistake to conclude that, because these few test cases were denied compensation, it’s been decided vaccines don’t play any role in regressive autism.” She went on to say that more studdies are needed.
Just like any fringe or psuedoscientific belief, evidence is ignored unless it supports the belief, and believers claim that more research needs to be done. In the case of autism and vaccines, more than enough research has been done. The proverbial dead horse has been beaten to the point of turning to dust and yet it’s not enough. The tragedy here is that so much money has been spent researching this link over and over, that it has reduced efforts that could actually determine causes, treatments, and a cure. Think about that. Obviously some people are not.
Of course, you have to feel for parents of autistic children. It’s extremely difficult to deal with something like that and of course they want to know why it happened and what can be done to fix it. It’s understandable that the answer they get from their doctor is not acceptable. But the fact is that science has not got to the bottom of this tragic condition. Genetic and environmental causes are being investigated but there is no answer yet. Previous hypotheses, including those involving vaccines, mercury, and thimerosal, have been investigated and ruled out. It’s time to devote more money and resources to research which may actually bear fruit.
For more information, please visit the Science Based Medicine Blog
February 10, 2009
Some folks over at the Pala Alto Research Center have created a new tool for Wikipedia users. It provides a dashboard at the top of an article indicating the activity of the top editors of that page. Although the community at large does a good job at policing Wikipedia content, information on controversial subjects can change daily and sometimes be questionable. This new tool provides a way to see who those top editors are and drill down into the discussions that have been taking place in the background. Though the specific edit information was available, this tool’s summary makes it much easier to see who the main contributors are and provides a glimpse of the edits over a timeline.
Take for example,the entry on Lunar Effect which I blogged about yesterday. There is not an overwhelming amount of activity (190 edits) compared to an entry on something like Barack Obama (16,000+). Regardless, you can see that a single user has provided 47.9% of the edits and see that person’s entries. You can also link to that user’s page and see ehat else they have been editing. It helps you as a reader assess the bias that may have crept in. In this case, the user has identified himself in a profile and contributed to a variety of subjects. In this particular article he has contributed specific content and cited sources as well as made typographic edits of other submissions. I have no reason tobelieve any bias from this user other than he wants to get the facts right. Of course this is just my opinion. You should always do your own research before deciding.
source: MIT Technology Review
Side note: You can get hours of fun and frustration looking over the edit history of a Wiki entry for a topic that brings all the nuts out like 911 Conspiracy Theories.
February 9, 2009
Posted by Chuck under science
, Science Links
| Tags: astrology
, full moon
Leave a Comment
It’s a full moon today and I saw an article that I wanted to pass along. I’ve blogged about moon phases before, but I fear that this story will never go away as long as there are people on the earth and a moon in the sky above.
SciAm.com today posted a short article discussing the “Lunar Effect” and asks “Does a full moon really trigger strange behavior?” Too lazy to go read it? I’ll cut to the chase for you: ABSOLUTELY NOT.